Explore whether AI can support assessment tasks while retaining quality and accountability.
This is innovation research and experimentation, rather than a formally deployed institutional marking system.
Understand. Build. Refine.
- 01
Considered where assistance might support repetitive assessment work.
- 02
Kept assessment criteria and professional judgement central.
- 03
Examined how generated suggestions would need checking before use.
What changed.
Exploration informed thinking about possible workflows. No automated grading deployment, accuracy score or institution-wide impact is claimed.
What I would carry forward.
Efficiency should never come at the expense of fairness, explainability or learner trust.
What I’d test next
Use approved, anonymised examples and compare outputs against expert assessment before any pilot.
Beyond education
Relevant to responsible AI evaluation and quality-controlled operational workflows.
↗ Knowledge acquired.Explore another project